| #4. |
| Published: 2025-06-09 [Mon] 20:28, by |
|
Rust, commonly known as iron oxide, is a reddish-brown flaky substance that forms on iron and its alloys (like steel) when they are exposed to oxygen and water. It's a prime example of corrosion, an electrochemical process where metals deteriorate through redox reactions. The formation of rust is a complex process involving several steps, but it can be summarized as the oxidation of iron in the presence of water and oxygen. Key Requirements for Rust Formation: Iron (Fe): The metal itself. Oxygen (O₂): From the air or dissolved in water. Water (H₂O): Essential for the electrochemical reactions. The presence of electrolytes (like salts) and acidic conditions in the water can significantly accelerate the rusting process. Mechanism and Chemical Reactions: Rusting is an electrochemical process, meaning it involves both oxidation and reduction reactions occurring simultaneously. Oxidation of Iron (Anode): At certain points on the iron surface (anodic areas), iron atoms lose electrons and are oxidized to iron(II) ions (Fe2+). Fe(s)→Fe2+(aq)+2e− These electrons then travel through the iron metal to other areas (cathodic areas). Reduction of Oxygen (Cathode): At the cathodic areas, oxygen dissolved in the water gains the electrons released by the iron. This reduction of oxygen typically occurs in the presence of water to form hydroxide ions (OH−). O2(g)+2H2O(l)+4e−→4OH−(aq) If the water contains acidic substances (like dissolved carbon dioxide forming carbonic acid), hydrogen ions can also be involved in the reduction: 4H+(aq)+O2(g)+4e−→2H2O(l) Formation of Iron(II) Hydroxide: The Fe2+ ions produced at the anode react with the OH− ions produced at the cathode to form iron(II) hydroxide. Fe2+(aq)+2OH−(aq)→Fe(OH)2(s) Oxidation of Iron(II) Hydroxide: Iron(II) hydroxide is then further oxidized by oxygen to form iron(III) hydroxide. 4Fe(OH)2(s)+O2(g)+2H2O(l)→4Fe(OH)3(s) Dehydration to Form Hydrated Iron(III) Oxide (Rust): Iron(III) hydroxide is unstable and dehydrates to form hydrated iron(III) oxide, which is commonly known as rust. The exact composition of rust varies, but it's generally represented as Fe2O3⋅nH2O, where 'n' represents a variable number of water molecules. 2Fe(OH)3(s)→Fe2O3⋅nH2O(s)+(3−n)H2O(l) Overall Simplified Reaction: While the process is complex, a simplified overall chemical equation for rust formation is often given as: 4Fe(s)+3O2(g)+6H2O(l)→4Fe(OH)3(s) Which then dehydrates to form: 4Fe(s)+3O2(g)+xH2O(l)→2Fe2O3⋅xH2O(s) Factors that Accelerate Rusting: Presence of Electrolytes: Salts (like in saltwater) increase the electrical conductivity of the water, facilitating the movement of ions and speeding up the electrochemical reactions. Acidity (Low pH): Acidic conditions promote the oxidation of iron. Temperature: Higher temperatures generally increase the rate of chemical reactions. Presence of Impurities: Impurities in the iron can create tiny electrochemical cells, accelerating rusting. Unlike protective oxide layers that form on some metals (like aluminum, which forms a tightly adhering aluminum oxide layer that prevents further corrosion), the rust layer on iron is typically porous and flaky. This allows oxygen and water to continue to reach the underlying metal, leading to further corrosion and ultimately weakening the iron object. |
| #1. Rust off! |
| Published: 2025-04-22 [Tue] 23:24, by |
|
Yo, listen up! dat Rust crew's been pushin' hard to get their language into the Linux kernel, but let's take a step back and examine their priorities, 'kay? They're all about Rust, Rust, Rust - but what about the stability and maintainability of the kernel? I'm talkin' about the millions of users who rely on Linux, not just some niche group of devs who wanna play with the latest shiny thing. Take marcan, the Asahi Linux lead, for example. He's been ragin' about the kernel community bein' resistant to change, but when you look at his own actions, it's clear his priority is gettin' Rust into the kernel, no matter what. He's talkin' about burnout, but it seems like he's more burnt out on the kernel community's cautious approach than on actually gettin' the job done. He be pushin new complexities and work on other people who are not interested in his fetish. We're just trying to ensure that any changes to the kernel are thoroughly tested and validated. I mean, come on, they're the ones who are tryin' to introduce a whole new language into the kernel - shouldn't they be the ones demonstratin' a willingness to work with the community and address our concerns? It's like they're more interested in provin' a point - that Rust can be used in the kernel - than in actually contributin' to the Linux ecosystem in a meaningful way. And that's just not cool, bro. We're talkin' about a critical piece of infrastructure here, not some playground for language enthusiasts. So, yeah, I'm suspicious of their priorities. It seems like they're more about promotin' Rust than about doin' what's best for Linux. And if that's the case, then we need to take a step back and re-evaluate their contributions. The kernel community's not against innovation, but we're not gonna sacrifice stability and maintainability on the altar of some new language or framework, either. |