Does Anonymity really improve discourse? (5 replies)
■ 🕑 4. Agree, but how do you define gatekeeping? I think you make good points, but how do you define gatekeeping? Because using it as a clutch can make communities stale. It'll just be old heads patting each other's back until death Sure you can encourage people how to act and discourage bad behaviours But I view that more as guidance rather than gatekeeping.
I think a focus on gatekeeping is good for communities that want to stay niche. Otherwise you end up with the citizen police of online.
That being said the strange world/heyuri thing linked here is a good example of gatekeeping. I love how they discourage wojaks and oomer talk. More sites should do that.
As for what gyudon_addict said, I think having a mix of anon and pseudo users encourages healthy diversity. Focus on one too much and either you get toxic hellholes or egoboo central.
For the scaling thing, I agree. It's best that anonymous places don't get bloated so there's nothing left but bad shitposts. It's best to spread other sites and encourage people find a space for them instead of trying to jam everyone in one location