| #1. New project: WikiWikiWiki |
| Published: 2024-06-08 [Sat] 18:14, by |
|
Greetings, https://wiki.gikopoi.com has been launched. Source code @ https://github.com/153/wikiwikiwiki |
| #2. |
| Published: 2024-06-09 [Sun] 17:14, by |
|
Taocana suggested making ?weekly? backups of the wiki. Any thoughts on this? It would be easy enough to do; the wiki is flatfile and no quasi-personal data like IPs or usernames are stored in the page-data directory. Feel free to edit and make pages as you see fit. https://wiki.gikopoi.com/w/ToDo is our current development roadmap. |
| #3. |
| Published: 2024-06-09 [Sun] 20:52, by |
|
>>2 yes i am not taocana and this is an excellent idea taocana is soooo hot look at that seaweed omggggggggggggghhhhhhhh |
| #4. |
| Published: 2024-06-10 [Mon] 19:04, by |
|
>>2 backup tarballs weekly or monthly would be cool. but it's fine to just have an rsync server. |
| #5. Poll: SJIS vs monospace by default? |
| Published: 2024-06-18 [Tue] 15:20, by |
|
Dear wiki editors and other forum members: I am currently using ``` code tags ``` to render <pre><code> regions via Mistune -- markdown renderer -- but there is a problem. There are cases where we sometimes want SJIS/AA art for these <pre><code> regions and other times when we want monospaced fonts (eg: ascii art, code, irc logs). So here's the question: what should be the default behavior? See: https://wiki.gikopoi.com/o/SandBox.5, preview and textarea I'm leaning towards making SJIS art be the default case and monospaced be the exception, which you can specify like ```m monospaced text ``` Main arguments for making SJIS/AA be the default: * it's easier to imagine a case where there are multiple SJIS arts on a page than multiple code/log/ascii regions * marking multiple preformat regions as "m" is easier than marking multiple SJIS regions as "aa" or "sjis" * generally speaking, code/irc logs still look okay in SJIS fonts while SJIS art is almost never acceptable in monospaced fonts * we are a wiki that caters to SJIS art enthusiasts |
| #6. |
| Published: 2024-06-18 [Tue] 16:02, by |
|
>>2 Weekly backups sound like a great idea. As far as I'm concerned, every single website needs some kind of built-in, automatic backup generation for important material, ideally publicly exportable, so that the users of the site have an easier time mirroring everything important should the original site go down. |
| #7. |
| Published: 2024-06-25 [Tue] 07:19, by |
| Hi guys |